Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

tree-care.info for tree advice

RE: CAVAT

Subject: RE: CAVAT
From: Howe, Ron
Date: Apr 25 2012 08:44:43
You scare me David! 


Ron Howe

Principal Tree Officer

Mole Valley District Council

Tel. 01306 879 286

Website -www.molevalley.gov.uk

 

Please take a look at the new 2012 Tree Protection Regulations and guidance 
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/2127685.pdf 
at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/605/contents/made


-----Original Message-----
From: David Lofthouse [mailto:David.Lofthouse@xxxxxxx.gov.uk] 
Sent: 24 April 2012 18:18
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: CAVAT

For your delectation.

 'here is a brief summary of how we've been using CAVAT to secure 
compensation from firms who have damaged our trees. 

Back in 2007 I was called out to deal with a tree that a Skip Lorry had 
destroyed. I managed to gather information on what happened and sent a bill 
to the skip company. 

I charged them for all remedial tree surgery, costs to supply, plant and 
maintain (for three years) replacement trees, and 20% on top for admin. I 
explained that if they did not pay this bill, and the matter went to court, I 
reserved the right to claim the full CAVAT value of the tree (£15,000 ish). 

Nevertheless, they refused to pay, and there were a few letters back and 
forth, but I built a strong case by getting witness statements from 
residents, builders, etc, 

Eventually legal were involved from a non payment perspective, and I was able 
to convince them to stand their ground. At the point where solicitors were 
being employed the skip firm caved in and paid.

Since then we have used the same tactic to claim funds from people who've 
damaged our trees and we have evidence of them doing so.

To summarise some of our cases - 
-          We've claimed approx £1500 from xxx (name of Mega supermarket 
chain redacted - so much for the crap lawyer theory) following a delivery van 
knocking over a tree: similar situations with xxxx ( name of a different maga 
supermarket chain redacted - even poorer view of the crap lawyer theory 
taking shape) and xxxx  (name of yet another different mega supermarket chain 
redacted - finally dissing the crap lawyer theory entirely) over the last few 
years.

-          In numerous (around ten) cases where van drivers have hit branches 
and caused damage, we've claimed either the costs of remedial works or a few 
hundred pounds to fund new trees, or both

-          We received over £3000 from a construction firm who sawed off one 
branch from a street tree adjacent to their development,

-          We took a thousand pounds from a company that cut down a sapling 
on the street to allow a long vehicle to access their site.

-          We took over £9000 from a firm that undertook unauthorised work to 
a council tree adjacent to the work site, specifically for the loss of CAVAT 
value

-          We took over £7000 from xxxx (redacted) after a street tree was 
knocked down by a lorry 

-          We've taken over a thousand pounds from a scaffolding firm who 
hacked down a tree in a council house garden they were working in for housing

-          We also took a building firm to court for non payment of approx 
£1000 bill we sent them for hacking off all the overhanging branches over 
their property, leaving the tree in need of further surgery and in our view 
dangerous, and we won. The judge ( crap judge ?)agreed that their actions had 
gone beyond any common law rights and awarded us victory, the bill has been 
paid.

When we include amounts that we've agreed beforehand with people for tree 
removals in relation to new build constructions (in addition to Section 106 
monies) we actually banked close to £30,000 last year using CAVAT valuations 
as the basis.

I find that it's all about how you approach each case (legendary kahunas 
help!), most often using CAVAT values as the threat, the stick behind a 
'carrot' claim of fees for remedial works and new trees where applicable.

I have negotiated some of these in various ways, for example, with those two 
claims for £7000 + £9000, the claims were initially higher, but as they took 
a long time to reach a conclusion, as a good will gesture I agreed to remove 
our administration fees (20%) explaining that I could not do any more than 
that.

This would have shown a court that we approach the situation in good faith 
and made every effort to resolve the matter prior to court proceedings.

I talked to the firms from the point of view that there's nothing more I can 
do, it's out of my hands, I'm doing my best to help them etc but if they 
don't pay 'now' then legal proceedings will be initiated in the next few 
days. 

The most important element in these matters is how we conduct ourselves when 
dealing with those who have damaged our trees; authoritative, understanding, 
confident and resolute. For example, We understand that it may have been an 
accident, but someone is going to have to pay for the remedial work, 
replacements trees etc. 

I would be very happy to discuss this further and to advise anyone who needs 
it on how we've made things happen here. We've been lucky that I managed to 
convince our financial and legal teams to back me up when I started issuing 
invoices in this way, and we now have a pretty strong working relationship, 
and seek advice from our legal team where necessary.'

I understand the officers in question are happy to provide more detail as 
above but I shall seek their agreement before passing on onerous queries on 
this.


Dave Lofthouse
Dip. Arb. (RFS) M.Arbor.A.
Arboricultural Manager
Greenspaces
London Borough of Merton
13th Floor Civic Centre London Rd , SM4 5DX

0208 545 3659/0790 1510 496

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Reduce waste - please do not print this message unless you need to.
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use 
of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
This email may contain information that is confidential and may contain 
sensitive or protectively marked information up to RESTRICTED and should be 
handled accordingly. 
This communication may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in 
accordance with relevant legislation. 
If you have received this email in error you must not copy, disclose or make 
any further use of the information contained within it. 
Instead we request that you notify the system manager.
Postmaster@xxxxxxx.gov.uk
http://www.merton.gov.uk
-----------------------------------------------------------------



--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Have you tried www.molevalley.gov.uk? Our easy to use, accessible website 
allows you to access our services at any time. You can look at planning 
applications, pay bills online or find out more about where you live using 
the Mole Valley and Me feature.

Please note that calls to the Council may be recorded and monitored for 
training purposes. The computer system may also be monitored and recorded to 
secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes. 
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use 
of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient, the E-mail and any files have been transmitted to you in 
error and any copying, distribution or other use of the information contained 
in them is strictly prohibited.




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/

Current thread