Re: [Bulk] RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
| Subject: | Re: [Bulk] RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth |
|
|---|---|---|
| From: | Scott Cullen | |
| Date: | May 16 2012 14:09:07 |
----- Original Message ----- From: Ian Brewster To: UK Tree Care Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 7:00 AM Subject: [Bulk] RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth IB: I recall an Ivy smothered Holly, after severance, the tree remains 'sickly looking' after 20 years reprieve. Bill: Doesn't that suggest it wasn't the Ivy causing the sickly-looking-ness Ian? IB: Yes, and perhaps to be regarded more as an indicator of a tree already in the throws of decline by other forces at work. SC: It also raises the question of what "decline" is. Literally it should be a decrease in condition (appearance, vitality, vigour, whatever) from some baseline. We typically think of declines as progressive to mortality. But 20 years suggests a plateau. Was it a runt to start with? Was it once a full crown that was shaded out by the ivy but otherwise healthy? Is it anamolus among hollies that it did not resprout upon realease or typical of hollies that age. I've always though that a slow growth rate, if steady, is neither a decline nor necessarily an indicator of poor condition. Old specimens get really old by slow, steady growth. Whether we like their appearance is very if not entirely subjective. Scott -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth continued
- RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 14:16:54 - RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 15:01:28 - RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 15:12:32 - RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 07:12:08 - RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 07:54:55 - RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 09:04:13 - Re: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 10:39:31 - RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 11:01:06 - Re: [Bulk] RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 14:09:07 - Re: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 15:53:15 - RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 17:50:13 - Re: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 18:00:31 - RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 18:13:12 - RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 16 2012 18:52:57 - Re: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 17 2012 08:18:51 - RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 17 2012 09:36:13 - RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth
May 17 2012 10:01:39
- RE: Safety Inspections and Ivy/Undergrowth