RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
| Subject: | RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter |
|
|---|---|---|
| From: | Tim Moya | |
| Date: | May 24 2012 21:57:58 |
How about ten times the diameter as in the 2005 version? Hi Luke - I did put something along those lines in my posting but took it out as it seemed I had already been disrespectful enough :-) -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter continued
- RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 24 2012 07:44:21- RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 24 2012 08:22:49- RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 24 2012 09:28:55- RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 24 2012 09:42:39 - RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 24 2012 09:47:16 - RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 24 2012 12:12:10 - RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 24 2012 21:30:24 - Re: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 24 2012 21:40:03 - RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 24 2012 21:57:58 - RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 25 2012 16:16:00 - RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 25 2012 16:31:24 - RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 28 2012 08:03:42 - RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 28 2012 08:20:31 - RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 28 2012 08:35:26 - RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 28 2012 09:09:00 - Re: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 28 2012 08:23:36 - Re: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
May 28 2012 08:43:29
- RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
- RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
- RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter
- RE: BS5837-2012 - Combined Stem Diameter