Alex –
I have more than once thought it would be useful if in their local validation
requirements LPA’s could make it clear that tree surveys should be “current”,
or be no more than two or three years old.
In practice I usually ring the tree officer and check before submitting an
out of date survey: I have had one, two and three year old surveys accepted,
but never more than that if I recall correctly.
The truth of the matter is that if a site is heavily populated by category A
and B trees that are intolerant of disturbance, and abutting or encroaching
into RPAs is highly likely, even a one year old survey might be
inappropriate. Conversely, with a site full of category ‘C’ trees and plenty
of space, a four year old survey might be fine.
However, I would prefer it if LPAs would put a time limit in their validation
requirements, as it would make it clear to consultants and developers from
the outset what will be acceptable and what won’t. Two years gets my vote,
but LPAs could always ask for a “current” survey, with a footnote explaining
that under normal circumstances this means 2 years, but on sites where the
risk of damage to trees is particularly high, the LPA might require an up to
date survey........
I‘m not sure I agree that this is something that should have appeared in the
revised BS: surely this is something for LPAs to decide on?
Regards, Simon
SIMON JONES ASSOCIATES Ltd.
ARBORICULTURAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS
Arboricultural Consultancy - Tree Surveys
Planning & Development · Hazard & Safety
Tree & Woodland Management - Expert Witnesses
Surrey: 01737 813058
London: 0207 127 0570
E-mail: simon@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk<mailto:simon@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk>
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Needs [mailto:aneeds@xxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk]
Sent: 09 July 2012 16:23
To: UK Tree Care
Cc: UK Tree Care
Subject: Re: BS re-survey timeframe?
Thanks to all for your responses.
Alex
Mark Welby <arbor101@xxxxxxxxxxx.com<mailto:arbor101@xxxxxxxxxxx.com>>
06/07/2012 10:01 >>>
Gary,
We tend to update reports if it's one of ours. If we are taking on a job
with a survey by another consultant, we will draft a covering letter to
accompany the application.
Regards
Mark
__________
On 6 Jul 2012, at 09:54, "Gary Marsden "
<gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.co.uk<mailto:gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.co.uk>> wrote:
Mark,
After you have made them complete a re-inspection of a site, do they
rewrite the whole report or attach a covering letter stating any changes / no
change?
thanks
Gary Marsden
GM Tree Consultants
P Please, consider your environmental responsibility. Before
printing this e-mail ask yourself: "Do I need a hard copy?"
This email transmission is confidential and intended solely for the
person or organisation to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute or disseminate the information, or
take any action in reliance of it. Any views expressed in this message are
those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
them to be the views of any organisation or employer. If you have received
this message in error, do not open any attachment but please notify the
sender (above) deleting this message from your system. Please rely on your
own virus check no responsibility is taken by the sender for any damage
rising out of any bug or virus infection.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Welby [mailto:arbor101@xxxxxxxxxxx.com]
Sent: 06 July 2012 06:33
To: UK Tree Care
Cc: UK Tree Care
Subject: Re: BS re-survey timeframe?
Alex,
We tend to recommend at least a re-visit after 12 months, just to
check tree condition and overall site conditions, if nothing else.
Doesn't cost the client too much and ensures that any documents are a true
representation of what's there at the time of application.
Regards
Mark
__________
On 5 Jul 2012, at 15:27, "Howe, Ron"
<Ron.Howe@xxxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk<mailto:Ron.Howe@xxxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk>>
wrote:
Hi Alex,
Personally Alex, I don't think you can put a standard time frame on
such matters and trying to fit everything into neat little boxes is
not always the answer. I think you need to think about what might
have
changed since the last survey ... Damage from adverse weather,
younger
trees maturing and even trees being removed and so on. I think a
year
old survey might be valid and you might just get away with two but
maybe three years up the line you have question it unless it is the
exact same development annnnnd, there's the rub, it depends on the
changes to the development doesn't it. Let's face it Alex, if you
get
a three year old survey in support of a proposal and find it
appropriate and valid then what's the problem????
Ron Howe
Principal Tree Officer
Mole Valley District Council
Tel. 01306 879 286
Website -www.molevalley.gov.uk
Please take a look at the new 2012 Tree Protection Regulations and
guidance
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/2127685.
pdf at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/605/contents/made
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Needs [mailto:aneeds@xxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk]
Sent: 05 July 2012 13:29
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: BS re-survey timeframe?
Hello all,
I would be grateful for views from both public and private practice
as
to what is considered a reasonable timeframe for re-measurement of
trees to enable a tree survey for development, that provides
statistical constraint for designers and layouts, to be considered
current and enable impact of development on trees to be fairly
assessed (assuming a diverse tree population of both leaf and
needle).
The BS does not appear to make any reference to this quite important
issue.
Thanks,
Alex
This email, and any attachments, is strictly confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended only for use by the addressee. If
you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or other use of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
contact the sender and delete it from your system. The opinions
expressed in this email are not necessarily those of Elmbridge
Borough Council.
This email has been scanned by Email Security Systems.
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/ Have you tried
www.molevalley.gov.uk<http://www.molevalley.gov.uk>?
Our easy to use, accessible website allows you to access our services at any
time. You can look at planning applications, pay bills online or find out
more about where you live using the Mole Valley and Me feature.
Please note that calls to the Council may be recorded and monitored
for training purposes. The computer system may also be monitored and recorded
to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful
purposes. This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient, the E-mail and any files have been
transmitted to you in error and any copying, distribution or other use of the
information contained in them is strictly prohibited.
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
