UKTC Archive

RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

Subject: RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam
From: Brewster, Ian
Date: Dec 03 2019 11:46:39
Was this additional encroachment highlighted in the report?
I think it is called a CEZ and using boards suspended on scaffold poles for 
manual workers to carry out such activities as bricklaying.
Has the cable and pipe layout been agreed.
Was this additional encroachment highlighted in the report?
I think it is called a CEZ and using boards suspended on scaffold poles for 
manual workers to carry out such activities as bricklaying.
Has the cable and pipe layout been agreed.


From: uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info <uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> 
On Behalf Of willross583@xxxxxxxxxxx.com
Sent: 03 December 2019 10:46
To: UK Tree Care <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
Subject: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

All,

Would appreciate advice/comment

I have a site where a pile and beam solution has been recommended within the
RPA of a lime tree (developers original arb report) for construction of a
dwelling, the construction team will require access to the RPA to
facilliatate works so ground protection will be required in this case due to
type of works cellular confinement is likely to be the best option as
opposed to mats (contractors normal choice). I wonder if anyone has
experience of this being left in place in the void under block and beam
or should it be removed, obviously as far as long term structural integrity
is concerned a structural engineer will be consulted by the construction
company. Any comments welcome.



Will




--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy
http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/<http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/>
NPS
 From: uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info 
<uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> On Behalf Of willross583@xxxxxxxxxxx.com
Sent: 03 December 2019 10:46
To: UK Tree Care <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
Subject: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

All,

Would appreciate advice/comment

I have a site where a pile and beam solution has been recommended within the
RPA of a lime tree (developers original arb report) for construction of a
dwelling, the construction team will require access to the RPA to
facilliatate works so ground protection will be required in this case due to
type of works cellular confinement is likely to be the best option as
opposed to mats (contractors normal choice). I wonder if anyone has
experience of this being left in place in the void under block and beam
or should it be removed, obviously as far as long term structural integrity
is concerned a structural engineer will be consulted by the construction
company. Any comments welcome.



Will




--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy
http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/<http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/>



-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy
http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/

JPEG image