UKTC Archive

RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

Subject: RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam
From: Brewster, Ian
Date: Dec 03 2019 15:26:45
Yes Julians’ point is valid as I used this as the main point for objecting to 
a small development and won the appeal.
I think the concern is diverting water under a property and undesirable 
consequence as a result, damp, mould, loss of adhesion to the piles…

The rigging aspect, you may find that using a larger rig may be able to arch 
over the RPA but dependant on access and available space .
.
Yes Julians’ point is valid as I used this as the main point for objecting to 
a small development and won the appeal.
I think the concern is diverting water under a property and undesirable 
consequence as a result, damp, mould, loss of adhesion to the piles…

The rigging aspect, you may find that using a larger rig may be able to arch 
over the RPA but dependant on access and available space .
.

From: uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info <uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> 
On Behalf Of willross583@xxxxxxxxxxx.com
Sent: 03 December 2019 15:21
To: UK Tree Care <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
Subject: RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

Ian,
Yes it was highlighted in the original report but no real solution was 
included, I agree it is called the CEZ but in this case the normal Temporary 
ground protection wont suffice as it wont hold a piling rig of any type hence 
the cellular confinement system,also scaffolding margins will need to be 
considered for which we may be able to use TGP/boards on the ground. As 
Julian mentions thought will also have to be given re a system for water 
ingress to the roots under the void.

Will
-----Original Message-----
From: 
uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info<mailto:uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> 
<uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info<mailto:uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>>
 On Behalf Of Brewster, Ian
Sent: 03 December 2019 11:46
To: UK Tree Care 
<uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info<mailto:uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>>
Subject: RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

Was this additional encroachment highlighted in the report?
I think it is called a CEZ and using boards suspended on scaffold poles for 
manual workers to carry out such activities as bricklaying.
Has the cable and pipe layout been agreed.
NPS
 From: uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info 
<uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> On Behalf Of willross583@xxxxxxxxxxx.com
Sent: 03 December 2019 15:21
To: UK Tree Care <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
Subject: RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

Ian,
Yes it was highlighted in the original report but no real solution was 
included, I agree it is called the CEZ but in this case the normal Temporary 
ground protection wont suffice as it wont hold a piling rig of any type hence 
the cellular confinement system,also scaffolding margins will need to be 
considered for which we may be able to use TGP/boards on the ground. As 
Julian mentions thought will also have to be given re a system for water 
ingress to the roots under the void.

Will
-----Original Message-----
From: 
uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info<mailto:uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> 
<uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info<mailto:uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>>
 On Behalf Of Brewster, Ian
Sent: 03 December 2019 11:46
To: UK Tree Care 
<uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info<mailto:uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>>
Subject: RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

Was this additional encroachment highlighted in the report?
I think it is called a CEZ and using boards suspended on scaffold poles for 
manual workers to carry out such activities as bricklaying.
Has the cable and pipe layout been agreed.



-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy
http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/

JPEG image