UKTC Archive

Re: RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

Subject: Re: RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam
From: Julian Morris
Date: Dec 03 2019 15:34:35
With the added problem (as I appreciated 2 days ago standing near a piling 
rig (actually not that near, but the ground was still shaking)) that a rig 
will cause compaction, like a huge whacker plate, even with a cellular 
confinement system.

Julian A. Morris - Professional Tree Services
jamtrees.co.uk  and  highhedgesscotland.com
0778 XXX XXXX - 0141 XXX XXXX


Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2019 at 3:21 PM
From: "willross583@xxxxxxxxxxx.com" <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
To: "UK Tree Care" <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
Subject: RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

Ian,
      Yes  it was highlighted in the original report but no real solution 
was included, I agree it is called the CEZ but in this case the normal 
Temporary ground protection wont suffice as it wont hold a piling rig of 
any type hence the cellular confinement system,also scaffolding margins 
will need to be considered for which we may be able to use TGP/boards on 
the ground. As Julian mentions thought will also have to be given re a 
system for water ingress to  the roots under the void.

Will
-----Original Message-----
From: uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info 
<uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> On Behalf Of Brewster, Ian
Sent: 03 December 2019 11:46
To: UK Tree Care <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
Subject: RE: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

Was this additional encroachment highlighted in the report?
I think it is called a CEZ and using boards suspended on scaffold poles for 
manual workers to carry out such activities as bricklaying.
Has the cable and pipe layout been agreed.
Was this additional encroachment highlighted in the report?
I think it is called a CEZ and using boards suspended on scaffold poles for 
manual workers to carry out such activities as bricklaying.
Has the cable and pipe layout been agreed.


From: uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info 
<uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> On Behalf Of 
willross583@xxxxxxxxxxx.com
Sent: 03 December 2019 10:46
To: UK Tree Care <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
Subject: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

All,

Would appreciate advice/comment

I have a site where a pile and beam solution has been recommended within 
the RPA of a lime tree (developers original arb report) for construction of 
a dwelling, the construction team will require access to the RPA to 
facilliatate works so ground protection will be required in this case due 
to type of works cellular confinement is likely to be the best option as 
opposed to mats (contractors normal choice). I wonder if anyone has 
experience of this being left in place in the void under block and beam or 
should it be removed, obviously as far as long term structural integrity is 
concerned a structural engineer will be consulted by the construction 
company. Any comments welcome.



Will




--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy 
http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/<http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/>
NPS
 From: uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info 
<uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> On Behalf Of 
willross583@xxxxxxxxxxx.com
Sent: 03 December 2019 10:46
To: UK Tree Care <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
Subject: No dig cellular confinement solution/pile and beam

All,

Would appreciate advice/comment

I have a site where a pile and beam solution has been recommended within 
the RPA of a lime tree (developers original arb report) for construction of 
a dwelling, the construction team will require access to the RPA to 
facilliatate works so ground protection will be required in this case due 
to type of works cellular confinement is likely to be the best option as 
opposed to mats (contractors normal choice). I wonder if anyone has 
experience of this being left in place in the void under block and beam or 
should it be removed, obviously as far as long term structural integrity is 
concerned a structural engineer will be consulted by the construction 
company. Any comments welcome.



Will




--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy 
http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/<http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/>



--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy 
http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/




--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy
http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/





-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy
http://www.boskytrees.co.uk/