RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
Subject: | RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent |
|
---|---|---|
From: | Jon Heuch | |
Date: | Oct 01 2020 16:17:19 |
I had assumed that if visibility splays (plural) had been conditioned then access through the said sitka had become part of the application i.e. the council had granted planning permission for the access route outside of the stated area...but we do not have all the details! It is for the council to correct their ways! Jon -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC forum is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy and Stockholm Tree Pits https://www.stockholmtreepits.co.uk
Current thread
- Felling Permission versus Planning Consent continued
- RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
Oct 01 2020 14:56:21 - Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
Oct 01 2020 15:26:18- RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
Oct 01 2020 15:31:56- RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
Oct 01 2020 15:41:32- Re: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
Oct 01 2020 16:40:02 - RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
Oct 01 2020 16:48:54
- Re: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
- RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
Oct 01 2020 15:50:50- RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
Oct 01 2020 16:24:35
- RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
- RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
- RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
- RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent
Oct 01 2020 16:17:19
- RE: Felling Permission versus Planning Consent