Re: Natives vs future
Subject: | Re: Natives vs future |
|
---|---|---|
From: | Jerry Ross | |
Date: | Oct 22 2020 15:22:28 |
Redwoods in the English countryside!!!! ruffle a few feathers haha See attached On 22/10/2020 16:08, Brynley Andrews wrote:
Hi Charlie Thanks for the input. The project does involve a lot of natives - it is just not being led by the natives only model. Redwoods in the English countryside!!!! ruffle a few feathers haha The list below. Thanks Bryn 1 Hazel 2 Coast redwood 3 Beech 4 Pedunculate oak 5 Aspen 6 Rauli beech 7 Grey alder 8 Rowan 9 Wild service tree 10 Hornbeam 11 Small-leaved lime 12 Wild cherry 13 White willow 14 Holly 15 Scots pine 16 Western red cedar 17 Lodgepole pine 18 Giant redwood 19 Silver birch 20 Black poplar 21 Common alder 22 Red alder 23 Italian alder 24 True service tree 25 Wych elm On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 12:35, Charlie Ashworth <charlie@xxxxxxxxxx.org.uk> wrote:Bryn, Sorry, my interest was in specifics. But re your interest, there is a need to plant a diverse range of species to meet climate/environmental changes, but if we stop planting natives in groups then we are not even giving them a chance to adapt. I understand the desire to plant for successful timber production, but there should be a balance between the old and the new - as there would be in a natural, unplanted, woodland environment - as well as a balance between profit and benevolence. Charlie Charlotte Ashworth MArborA www.tree-care.org.uk charlie@xxxxxxxxxx.org.uk Mobile:07812 XXX XXX Office: 01270 XXX XXXOn 22 Oct 2020, at 09:59, Brynley Andrews <brynley.andrews@xxxxxx.com>wrote:Charlie, Tahir, Jim Thanks for the replies. The current farmland covers 120ha and we are aiming for planting ~ 15haofwoodland. Orchards and parkland are also happening. A further ~ 400ha are in the pipeline. The specifics about right species and management are not what interest me here, which is the battle between the old 'native species are bestmantra'and modern 'climate/carbon/futurism' models. My point being - surely itistime for climate/carbon/futurism, and therefore, those pushing nativesas aknee jerk response are out of touch? Being slightly provocative for the sake of debate. Thanks Bryn On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 09:31, Jim Quaife <jq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.co.uk>wrote:Hi Brynley, Sounds like a really absorbing project, but with no details aboutanythingall one can say is that depending upon scale there is usually a compromise. The ambition for a sawmill is very much long term if it is based on current planting! The appetite for a sawmill suggests that there is already someproductionin view, but again a sawmill can be a Woodmizer (or something similar - owned or contract hire) or a static installation. If it is to beanythingother than casual/incidental the throughput needs to be substantial. The use of exotics is to my mind essential as a diversity safeguard for bio-security. The fascination with woodlands is that they can accommodate a wide range of interests and the role of the consultant is to explore them all andtocome up with a balanced scheme. Again, depending upon scale it doesn't necessarily have to be done in one hit. Enjoy! Jim -----Original Message----- From: uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info [mailto: uktc-request@xxxxxx.tree-care.info] On Behalf Of Brynley Andrews Sent: 22 October 2020 08:49 To: UK Tree Care Subject: Natives vs future Dear all I am involved in a large scale farm woodland planting scheme. The FC favour high performance carbon/timber/eco species, and theANOB/LAlandscape planners favour traditional species to form traditionallandscapefeatures. There is considerable overlap potential but the FC seem to be moreinlinewith modern thinking. And arguably the LA/ANOB are part of the oldfailedmodel. Also, The landowner intends to eventually run a sawmill on the Eatate. I am proposing a highly diverse mix of 50/50 exotics & natives as suitsthesoil/climate/objectives - with special emphasis on targeting habitat for priority fauna species. It is a fun project & I welcome your input. Thanks Brynley -- Brynley Arboriculturist / urban forester -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC forum is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancyandStockholm Tree Pits https://www.stockholmtreepits.co.uk -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC forum is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancyandStockholm Tree Pits https://www.stockholmtreepits.co.uk-- Brynley M M Andrews MSc., C.Env., M.Arbor.A. www.brynleyandrewsassociates.com 01935 XXXXXX 07970 XXXXXX -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC forum is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy and Stockholm Tree Pits https://www.stockholmtreepits.co.uk-- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC forum is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy and Stockholm Tree Pits https://www.stockholmtreepits.co.uk
-- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC forum is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy and Stockholm Tree Pits https://www.stockholmtreepits.co.uk
Monkey Puzzle trees on Hergest Ridge.jpg
Description: JPEG image
Current thread
- Natives vs future continued
- RE: Natives vs future
Oct 22 2020 15:37:34 - RE: Natives vs future
Oct 22 2020 15:41:03 - RE: Natives vs future
Oct 22 2020 16:03:25 - RE: Natives vs future
Oct 22 2020 22:09:54 - RE: Natives vs future
Oct 22 2020 22:39:46 - Re: Natives vs future
Oct 23 2020 08:04:09 - RE: Natives vs future
Oct 23 2020 07:18:03 - Re: Natives vs future
Oct 22 2020 15:08:54 - Re: Natives vs future
Oct 22 2020 15:22:28 - RE: Natives vs future
Oct 22 2020 15:31:14 - Re: Natives vs future
Oct 22 2020 15:37:32 - Re: Natives vs future
Oct 23 2020 08:31:54 - RE: Natives vs future
Oct 23 2020 08:53:41 - RE: Natives vs future
Oct 22 2020 15:39:23 - Re: Natives vs future
Oct 23 2020 13:09:36 - Re: Natives vs future
Oct 23 2020 13:12:50 - Re: Natives vs future
Oct 24 2020 15:00:22
- RE: Natives vs future