UKTC Archive

Re: Peer reviewed tree risk management Research Article

Subject: Re: Peer reviewed tree risk management Research Article
From: Michael Richardson
Date: Feb 13 2021 16:54:30
Once again Jeremy thanks for producing a peer reviewed article and paying
so that all can have free access to it.

Michael

Michael Richardson B.Sc.F., BCMA
Ontario MTCU Qualified Arborist
Richardson Tree Care
Richardsontreecare.ca
613-475-2877
800-769-9183

  <http://www.richardsontreecare.ca/images/Tree_Doc_logo_email.png>



On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 11:16 AM Jeremy Barrell <
Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.co.uk> wrote:

I can now confirm that Taylor and Francis have corrected the spelling
error in the title of the Research Article The implications of recent
English legal judgments, inquest verdicts, and ash dieback disease for the
defensibility of tree risk management regimes, and the updated version can
be downloaded free here
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03071375.2020.1854996?src=.
Although not a perfect system, the content of peer reviewed articles is
generally more trustworthy than those we regularly see referenced with no
such controls.  I had two very astute peer reviewers who made some useful
and valuable suggestions, and the article is much better for it.  This
article deals with strategic tree risk management, and I am currently
working on the next one in the series that will focus on the checking
process to help inspectors feel more comfortable with the decisions that
they make.

Jeremy Barrell
01425 XXXXXX
Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.co.uk



--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC forum is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy and
Stockholm Tree Pits
https://www.stockholmtreepits.co.uk




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC forum is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy and
Stockholm Tree Pits
https://www.stockholmtreepits.co.uk