UKTC Archive

Re: Biodiversity value of a private garden lawn?

Subject: Re: Biodiversity value of a private garden lawn?
From: Wayne Tyson
Date: Nov 15 2021 21:01:30
It appears that "biodiversity" is a scientifically valid term that has
(predictably?) been hijacked or weaponized by the BSers who rule over
intellectual honesty.

WT

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 8:24 AM Bill Anderson <
anderson.arb.original@xxxxxx.com> wrote:

Angus said: I'm deeply skeptical of the biodiversity value of a private
garden lawn and indeed any landscaping put in place by commercial
housebuilders...

I'd say you were right to be sceptical Angus, but Sheffield University did
a study that showed domestic housing away from city centres had better
biodiversity than intensely cultivated agricultural land. (Google
"biodiversity in urban gardens, bugs1 and bugs 2") However I suspect it
takes some time for this sort of biodiversity to develop in back gardens,
and I suspect the usual housebuilders' landscaping schemes are only a step
in vaguely the right direction. I'm sick to the back teeth of supermarket
car park type planting that features Cherry Laurel and other allelopathic
plants that do very little to improve biodiversity. I'd rather see new
developments with no landscaping and the new occupants actually taking an
interest. How you legislate for that I dunno.

I've not read the biodiversity net gain matrix thing yet but if it doesn't
acknowledge that removing some plants is actually to improve biodiversity
then there's something wrong with it.

Bill.



--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC forum is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy and
Stockholm Tree Pits
https://www.stockholmtreepits.co.uk




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC forum is supported by Bosky Trees arboricultural consultancy and
Stockholm Tree Pits
https://www.stockholmtreepits.co.uk